Southwestern Virginia is crawling with musical talent. Although there are many venues that host live music, the supply of talented musicians is far greater than the number of places to play. In this "buyers market" venues can get away with paying little or nothing for quality music, however, there are many advantages to hiring true professional musicians.
There's more to being a professional than being paid. Professional musicians work hard at honing their skills, but they also take care of business. Professionals show up and start on time, play long sets, take short breaks, stay sober, and make sure their performance enhances the events at which they perform. They also make sure they have adequate sound reinforcement, they advertise and update their performances on their website, and send their performance schedule to large mailing lists. Professionals bring new business the places they play, thus increasing their visibility and bottom line. Professional musicians should be paid for this service.
Hobbyists and amateur musicians do not play for pay. Their motivation may be to have fun, to socialize or to experience the ego gratification of audience response. I know many amateurs and hobbyists who are as good--or better--musicians than professionals that I know, but because they are not playing for payment, they have no incentive to take care of business.
I often hear stories from venue owners and event coordinators about acts that show up late, play short sets and take long breaks, drink too much, and play too loud. I listen politely, but I often think “You get what you pay for.” To be penny wise is to be pound foolish. Venues and events should look beyond an acts musical talent and what it may cost them. If an act takes care of business, the venue profits and the act should receive fair compensation. If an act doesn't take care of business, they should not be hired and certainly not asked back.
While talent buyers should consider and appreciate an act’s professional qualities. Professional musicians need to respect the risks and costs of hosting musical performances. A thriving and high quality music scene depends on mutual respect between the musicians who make it happen and the places where it happens. All parties concerned should be valued, respected and compensated.
There should and always will be places for amateurs and hobbyists to play. Open mic nights, church picnics, family gatherings, parking lots, opening act slots, and pro-am jams are all excellent places for amateurs to perform. They can get experience if they want to develop their act, and may then graduate to smaller venues and events or showcases as they build a following and hone their professional skills.
Professionals and amateurs should not perform at events or venues that profit from their performance, yet do not compensate them. Too many acts, professional and amateur, are willing to behave like a desperate prom date. They are willing to jump in the back seat and give it away because a promoter whispers "Of course, I love you." If an act wants respect from venues, events and audiences, not to mention the community of musicians, they have to have enough self-respect and courage to demand fair payment for their services. If a venue doesn't want to pay, musicians should walk away.
Venues and events that host music should take into consideration an act’s professionalism and make an honest assessment of what value they add to their bottom line and pay them accordingly. Venues that prey upon musician's need for "exposure" or "experience" are exploiting them. Musicians of any stripe that play for free, when a venue or event profits from their performance, are devaluing the market for all musicians. Remember, exploitation is exploitation, even when you volunteer for it!

4 comments:
Scott Perry's Quote of the Month
"You have reached the pinnacle of success as soon as you become uninterested in money, compliments, or publicity."
Thomas Wolfe
Isn't this just a tad hipocritical?
I'm not sure who or what you think is hypocritical. The "Quote of the Month" ( a misnomer if ever there was one as I change the quotes quite infrequently), are selected as food for thought -- not necessarily statements of personal belief.
If you're accusing me of being hypocritical because you perceive my post as at odds with Wolfe's quote then I would say my journey to "the pinnacle of success," finds me just entering the foothills!
Money is simply a means to necessary ends (food, clothing and shelter for my family), not the end itself. Artistic expression and integrity are my touchstones. If I played music solely for "money, compliments and publicity" I think I would be playing something other than traditional blues and roots! More likely I'd be rapping on American Idol.
Scott,
You make some interesting points in your post and I believe that they make sense.
If a musician brings in more customers than other musicians playing in the same venue, he should command a better exchange.
In an environment where there are more musicians than places to play, it must be a great temptation for the owner of the venue to pay as little as possible, or nothing at all and hope that patrons will supply enough tips to keep the musicians coming back.
In a free market, customers are free to choose the combination of dinner and entertainment that suits their pocketbook and mood.
As a musician, you need to create an existence that is independent of the venue you play in, or you become invisible when you are not playing.
Perhaps the ultimate solution is to own the venue and hire only professional musicians like yourself. In this way you will embrace both sides of the problem and may find a solution that works for the musicians and allows you to operate competitively.
In any event, more dialog on this subject may generate some changes. I wish you well. Keep blogging!
Thanks for the kind words David. I'm not sure owning and operating a venue fits into my schedule right now. I find owning a music store, giving guitar lessons, homeschooling a 6th grader, maintainging our 40 acre "farm" and keeping some semblance of a performing career keeps me busy enough!
I wholeheartedly agree that musicians need to keep their identity seperate from the venues they play. However, an audience's perception of a performer is colored by the venues they play (and how they are renumerated), just as the perception of a venue is colored by who plays there.
When I first moved to Floyd no venues paid guarantees. My dialogue with artists and venues has, I think, had a hand in that changing that. The important thing is for artists and venues to respect and value each other and work together at creating a scene that thrives and is fair to all parties concerned.
Post a Comment